Ref (was Re: inlining)

[Chris R. Miller]

superdan wrote:
> Chris R. Miller Wrote:
> 
>> JAnderson wrote:
>>> superdan wrote:
>>>> Jarrett Billingsley Wrote:
>>>>> Please don't take this as an attack, I'm not trying to make you feel 
>>>>> like you're less of a member of the community.  Swearing on the 
>>>>> internet just makes you seem like a 13-year-old boy. 
>>> I'm glad I'm not the only one.
>>>
>>> In general I find it hard to read someone text if it has swearing all 
>>> over it.  I generally ignore those emails as I feel they have no 
>>> valuable content and they make me feel sick.  I don't want to be 
>>> thinking about the bathroom while in technical discussions.
>>>
>>> If someone wants to be taken seriously they should try to at least 
>>> communicate with proper edicate.
>> Well if you're ______ity _____ cussing all the _____ time it makes your 
>> _______ing messages so much _______ing longer it takes so ______ing long 
>> to _______ing read them that I just _____ing ignore them.
> 
> did you mean "your"?

No, my grammar was correct.  You're = you are (contraction), your = you 
(possessive).

Perhaps you'd like to go play the part of a Grammar Nazi with the other 
guys on irc.freenode.net/##English ?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 258 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20080729/fee5fd88/attachment.pgp>