Sharing in D

[superdan]

Walter Bright Wrote:

> superdan wrote:
> > Walter Bright Wrote:
> >>> So "shared" will tell the compiler to automatically fence, etc?
> >> Yes.
> > 
> > yech. so i write this:
> > 
> > ++a; ++b; ++c;
> > 
> > and very different code comes down the pike depending on a or b or c
> > being shared. not easy to clarify the code is correct. this ain't
> > cool.
> 
> 
> If conventional code were generated for i++, and i was accessed from 
> multiple threads, the code is *broken*.

i grok that. my problem is that your shared doesn't help me with writing good code in that case. ++x is just wrong for shared x. i'd rather have it disabled or somethin'.