D2 status interim report ?
Simen Kjaeraas
simen.kjaras at gmail.com
Mon Jun 23 11:00:43 PDT 2008
Extrawurst <spam at extrawurst.org> wrote:
> Walter Bright schrieb:
>> Extrawurst wrote:
>>> Hey Walter,
>>> this is just a list of changes which were originally planned to be
>>> integrated into D2.0 according to the slides you and Andrei presented
>>> on DConference '07. So please give us a comment on what perhaps has
>>> changed or when certain things are going to be addressed.
>>> A little insight on your roadmap would be great.
>>>
>>> (1) STRUCT opImplicitCastTo/From (p.21)
>>> ---------------------------------
>>> How do you want to solve the problem of overloading by return value
>>> which would be necessary to solve something like the example in the
>>> slides (p.21):
>>>
>>> struct S{
>>> int opImplicitCastTo(){...}
>>> float opImplicitCastTo(){...}
>>> }
>>
>> Still planning on it.
>
> So does it mean we gonna get overloading on different return types ?
I wouldn't bet on it. This is already possible:
struct S
{
void opCastTo(ref int result) {}
void opCastTo(ref float result) {}
}
int i;
float f;
S s;
s.opCastTo(i);
s.opCastTo(f);
Add syntactic sugar to taste, inform the compiler that opImplicitCastTo is
a special function, and voilà!
-- Simen
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list