Proposal: real struct literals

[Jarrett Billingsley]

"Mike" <vertex at gmx.at> wrote in message news:op.uc9uhjp1kgfkbn at lucia...
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:30:28 +0200, Jarrett Billingsley 
> <kb3ctd2 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Dreaming, this also opens up the possibility for named function 
>> parameters.
>
> Class literals?

That, I'm not so sure about.  How often do you have public class fields?  I 
mean, I'm sure someone could come up with a use for them, but structs seem 
much more suited to having literals.