synchronized { }

Vladimir Panteleev thecybershadow at gmail.com
Thu Jun 26 15:18:58 PDT 2008


On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 04:18:41 +0300, Walter Bright  
<newshound1 at digitalmars.com> wrote:

> Right now, if you use a synchronized statement with no argument, it will  
> sync on a mutex unique to that statement.
>
> Does anyone write threading code that depends on this behavior?

I think I used it once for:

void write_synced(string s)
{
	synchronized writef("%s", s);
}

or maybe it was some other external resource not linked to a class.

-- 
Best regards,
  Vladimir                          mailto:thecybershadow at gmail.com



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list