Feature Request - Raw HTML in ddoc comments

[Tomas Lindquist Olsen]

Derek Parnell wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 06:56:02 +0000, Janice Caron wrote:
> 
>> On 02/03/2008, Derek Parnell <derek at psych.ward> wrote:
>>> Everything that we've been saying re Ddoc is already documented in the DMD
>>>  distribution. Read through http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/ddoc.html.
>> Obviously, I have already read that document! (I quoted from it a few posts up).
> 
> From your posts, it is *not* obvious that you have read it, even though
> some parts were "quoted". It really isn't that hard to understand but you
> seem to be having a devil of a time doing so.
> 

Cmon people. This discussion is not longer about Ddoc. Clearly people just disagree what Ddoc 
should really do, regardless of how (well or not) it's documented.

IMHO we should just ditch it and put and effort into getting doxygen fixed for D.