opMul

[Bill Baxter]

Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:10:23 +0100, Denton Cockburn <diboss at hotmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>> Is there a reason why opMul cannot be called on a constant object?
>>
>> This restriction is hardcoded (I clearly don't have a choice for my 
>> object).
> 
> 
> That would be due to opMul not being defined as a const function.
> 
> 
> import std.stdio;
> 
> struct Foo1
> {
>     int bar;
>     
>     Foo1 opMul(int rhs)
>     {
>         bar *= rhs;
>         return *this;
>     }
> }
> 
> struct Foo2
> {
>     int bar;
>     
>     Foo2 opMul(int rhs) const // difference here
>     {
>         bar *= rhs;
>         return *this;
>     }
> }

I can't keep up here.  Is a trailing 'const' legal D syntax now?

--bb