We need to clarify if 'real' is the 'default floating point type'or not.
Anders F Björklund
afb at algonet.se
Mon Mar 3 14:35:06 PST 2008
Don Clugston wrote:
> One workable option would be to split the current 'real' type into
> real80, doubledouble, and quadruple (depending on the system) and then
> we had:
I think I used "extended" for real80, not that it really matters but.
And "quadruple" is a bit long in the tooth, so "quad" rolls better...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_precision
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quad_precision
--anders
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list