opMul

Janice Caron caron800 at googlemail.com
Thu Mar 6 03:44:09 PST 2008


On 06/03/2008, Simen Kjaeraas <simen.kjaras at gmail.com> wrote:
>  const foo x; is the same as const(foo) x;.
>  Thus, const foo y(){}; should also mean const(foo) y(){};.

And of course, it doesn't. (Obviously, you knew that).

But that's the problem, I agree.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list