is this FUD?

[B Jakob]

hi
this is my first post - so hello everybody ;-)

I hate to ask questions that have been ask over and over again. I also 
not really fond of legal questions. But I have to ask some licencing 
questions about dmd and gdc.

As a newbie in the D land I have to say that trying to find information 
about lincencing of D is a real seek and hide game.

the reasing why I got interested in this again is the following 
statement of this blog article

(http://leonardo-m.livejournal.com/52462.html):

-------------------------

"[...] GDC, the only working GCC frontend (http://dgcc.sf.net/ ), is 
largely copyrighted to DigitalMars. This makes it impossible to 
officially include it in the GCC distribution. [...]"

------------------------

here is a thread on a digitalmars list that points in the same direction:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/D/gnu/Any_progress_with_inclusion_of_GDC_into_the_main_GCC_trunk_2695.html


BUT !!

on the wiki4d page they say:
(http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?FaqRoadmap#Licensing)

"The DMD front-end source is available under dual ( GPL and  Artistic) 
licens"

even the best piece of information from George Wrede on this subject 
doesn't make it clear to me if the comment on the blog is true or not:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/37364.html#N37364

So please, can somebody help with this?

thanks

//benzo