Idea to ease tail-const class reference woes

[Steven Schveighoffer]

"Janice Caron" wrote
> Oops. Typo. Let's try that again...
>
> Sounds more work than
>
>    import std.typecons;
>    Rebindable!(C) myClass = new C;
>
> which is planned for the future. (See D2.012 change log)

One further question on this...

If I have:

class C
{
   void foo() {};
}

Rebindable!(const(C)) myC = new C;

myC.foo();

Is the plan for this to compile (I know it doesn't today)? If not, then this 
is not an acceptable solution.

-Steve