Memory Safety

[davidl]

在 Sun, 23 Mar 2008 01:42:23 +0800，Walter Bright  
<newshound1 at digitalmars.com> 写道:

> davidl at 126.com wrote:
>> So D is going towards totally anti-JIT ?
>
> I don't know what you mean by that.
>
I thought D is going to be the cut to the subset of D. Recently I get  
informed that it will be a compiler option. There everything goes fine. :D

>> As far as I can see, JIT uses technology of constructing user data and  
>> executing them. I think this D subset still leaves a dirty way which  
>> need to be declared explicitly to allow executing JIT compiler's output.
>>



-- 
使用 Opera 革命性的电子邮件客户程序: http://www.opera.com/mail/