Proposal for scoped const contracts

[Janice Caron]

On 26/03/2008, Roberto Mariottini <rmariottini at mail.com> wrote:
> If I understand correctly this could be achieved with the plain old
>  'final' keyword. Am I right?

It could equally be achieved with the "heffalump" keyword, if we
defined one, and made it do exactly we want. :-)

However, if you're asking whether or not there is an /existing/ way of
achieving the desired goal, there isn't. So no, I think you are not
right.