const
Janice Caron
caron800 at googlemail.com
Fri Mar 28 07:22:13 PDT 2008
On 28/03/2008, Oskar Linde <oskar.lindeREM at ovegmail.com> wrote:
> 1. Plain data types don't need the storage constancy to be a part of the
> type.
But they do, for the following reason. Suppose I implement a custom
container. Then I would want
MyContainer!(char)
to behave differently from
MyContainer!(const(char))
The only way I can see of achieving this is if char and const(char)
are distinct types.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list