const

[Janice Caron]

On 31/03/2008, Jason House <jason.james.house at gmail.com> wrote:
> Maybe rov or read.

Again, "readable" doesn't imply "not writeable". (It is perfectly
possible for a thing to be both readable and writeable at the same
time).

Let's just stick with "in". It's /already implemented/ in one of the
places where it's needed, and let's face it, keywords don't get much
shorter!