Static strings in templates
Janice Caron
caron800 at googlemail.com
Fri May 2 01:55:07 PDT 2008
I don't know if this is a bug or not. Someone please help me out.
Here's the deal. Suppose I declare:
int foo(T)(T s, T t)
with the expectation that the template will be passed a couple of
strings, wstrings or dstring. All works fine if I do
string s;
string t;
int n = foo(s,t);
However, the template can't be instantiated with
int n = foo("abcde","fg");
because the type of the first argument is invariant(char)[5u], and the
type of the second argument is invariant(char)[2u], and the compiler
can't figure out that both can (and should) be implicitly cast to
invariant(char)[].
It occurs to me that even with only a single parameter, passing string
literals to templated string function will lead to a lot of template
bloat, if the template always considers the argument type to be
invariant(char)[N] (for some N), as opposed to simply
invariant(char)[].
Is this a bug? Can anything be done about this? Is there a workaround?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list