why ; ?

Nick Sabalausky a at a.a
Fri May 9 14:57:59 PDT 2008


"bearophile" <bearophileHUGS at lycos.com> wrote in message 
news:g02cej$7hb$1 at digitalmars.com...
> Dynamic languages allows you to spot and fix those bugs faster

I've seen fans of dynamic languages say this a lot. I'm not challenging it, 
so please don't take this as an attack, but I'm curious: How are dynamic 
languages are considered to be easier/faster to spot/fix bugs? 





More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list