Hello D World

[Dee Girl]

Robert Fraser Wrote:

> Dee Girl wrote:
> > The minimalist in me wants Phobos, the app writer wants Tango,
> 
> Tango is very easily "stripped down" (i.e. dependencies between packages 
> are well thought-out), so it's a lot easier to make Tango more minimal 
> than it is to do with Phobos. Where does the whole "Phobos is more 
> minimal" attitude come from (just that it's more similar to the C/C++ 
> standard libraries or that its feature set is smaller...?)

I was referring only in terms of what I need to learn to get going. I think some aspects of Tango are more complicated than they could be. There is a history of flame wars regarding Tango and Phobos. Therefore please allow me to specify that I do not have any attitude yet, only a subjective impression. I have not used either library yet. Thank you, Dee Girl