why ; ?
Yigal Chripun
yigal100 at gmail.com
Thu May 15 13:43:17 PDT 2008
Joel C. Salomon wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
>> Yigal Chripun wrote:
>>> on the contrary, I've seen an article online of two people that did
>>> exactly that. they defined an alternative syntax for C++ which is both
>>> consistent and preserves the semantics of c++. it was their Thesis or
>>> something like that. just stumbled on it via google.
>> Link?
>
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Significantly_Prettier_and_Easier_C++_Syntax>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFILD6UzLx4GzBL9dYRAjMrAJ9WiMCBA5qUswzHBhtypOwSjfdxrgCgzIbN
> vln72iicI3pFCgpDIyD4th8=
> =BGPP
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Yeah, this is exactly what I was talking about :)
thanks Joel. you saved me the need to go look it up myself.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list