Why we chose not to use D for our Linux project
Max Samukha
spamme at spambox.com
Tue May 20 04:58:06 PDT 2008
Ty Tower Wrote:
> This is a typical of a lot of what like to call themselves "The D Community"
> They are more interested in attacking the messenger.
>
> Torhu says as well that DBI should work with 1.029 etc etc but has he checked? Has Lars checked? Obviously Bill checked and it didn't .
>
> If you aren't sure why post?
>
I checked out the D DBI trunk about two weeks ago. It didn't build out of the box but after a number of trivial fixes it did. It's been working pretty much as expected (with MySql backend, I haven't tried it with other backends yet). There was a bug or two like fetched resultsets being freed prematurely, but the bugs were trivial to fix as well. Currently I'm building a thin ORM layer on top of DDBI and I think it is turning out to be a fast and flexible solution suitable for my purposes.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list