Why we chose not to use D for our Linux project

[Neal Alexander]

Chris R. Miller wrote:
> Ty Tower Wrote:
> 
>> Lars Ivar Igesund Wrote:
>>>> Don't start on me ! I am 
>>>> still here and contributing with posts wherever I see stupidity, 
>>> Contributing more stupidity?
>> Now you see Lars here be your way, and your error.
>> Attack the messenger and ignore the message 
>> We all fall into it from time to time but you do it regularly whenever someone says anything negative.
>>
>> What happens then is no-one dare give you a message for fear of ridicule and being on your high horse you influence others with your view .
>> So if its OK for you to do it ,it will be acceptable for others and this permeates down to other forum members and nothing gets fixed 
>>
>> This is how it is with D now . You could fix it simply by a small change to  your approach and attitude. If you assume directness is rudeness you are very wrong.
> 
> I wise man speaks of what he sees.  The easiest approach to communication in a newsgroup, forum, or mailing list is a simple loop:
> 
> 1) State what you see.
> 2) State what you think.
> 3) (optional) State what you ****think**** should change.
> 4) Goto: 1
> 
> Ty sees a resistence to change.  He thinks that this is making D a harder language for new people to get into.  He thinks that people should start taking criticism less personally and more like contstructive criticism.
> 
> I see no reason for animosity here.
> 
I don't see how you can take a person who has conversations with 
themselves (under different aliases) seriously.

Especially when all the multiple personalities are douchebags haha.