Why we chose not to use D for our Linux project

[Neal Alexander]

Chris R. Miller wrote:
> Neal Alexander wrote:
>> Chris R. Miller wrote:
>>> Ty Tower Wrote:
>>>
>>>> Lars Ivar Igesund Wrote:
>>>>>> Don't start on me ! I am still here and contributing with posts 
>>>>>> wherever I see stupidity, 
>>>>> Contributing more stupidity?
>>>> Now you see Lars here be your way, and your error.
>>>> Attack the messenger and ignore the message We all fall into it from 
>>>> time to time but you do it regularly whenever someone says anything 
>>>> negative.
>>>>
>>>> What happens then is no-one dare give you a message for fear of 
>>>> ridicule and being on your high horse you influence others with your 
>>>> view .
>>>> So if its OK for you to do it ,it will be acceptable for others and 
>>>> this permeates down to other forum members and nothing gets fixed
>>>> This is how it is with D now . You could fix it simply by a small 
>>>> change to  your approach and attitude. If you assume directness is 
>>>> rudeness you are very wrong.
>>>
>>> I wise man speaks of what he sees.  The easiest approach to 
>>> communication in a newsgroup, forum, or mailing list is a simple loop:
>>>
>>> 1) State what you see.
>>> 2) State what you think.
>>> 3) (optional) State what you ****think**** should change.
>>> 4) Goto: 1
>>>
>>> Ty sees a resistence to change.  He thinks that this is making D a 
>>> harder language for new people to get into.  He thinks that people 
>>> should start taking criticism less personally and more like 
>>> contstructive criticism.
>>>
>>> I see no reason for animosity here.
>>>
>> I don't see how you can take a person who has conversations with 
>> themselves (under different aliases) seriously.
>>
>> Especially when all the multiple personalities are douchebags haha.
> 
> In the event that you are accusing me of being "personality" of Ty, I 
> rebuke you and must say you have no idea what you are talking about.
> 
> We are two different people who live on different continents and have 
> different lives.  I resent your implications to the contrary.
> 
If i were accusing you of being him, why would i ask how *you* could 
take *him* seriously.

And as far is i can tell, i've seen 2-3 handles that could easily be 
aliases of his. Based on their mannerisms/writing style, and how they 
always seem to agree with each other and bump each others threads.

Not that i really care either way, but Lars is probably right to call 
him a dumbass heh.