foo!(bar) ==> foo{bar}

[Alexander Pánek]

Top posting is bad!

Tiago Carvalho wrote:
> Not beeing a very active template programmer I find the @ version the 
> easiest on the eyes (since it appears there's no technical differences 
> from !() ). Both in template@( int, float ) and the single type 
> template at int suggested by Andre.

But since !() is established and used for *years* now, I don’t see a 
point in changing it, just because something else might be easier on the 
eyes for some people.