foo!(bar) ==> foo{bar}

[Denis Koroskin]

On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 21:56:57 +0400, Sean Kelly <sean at invisibleduck.org>  
wrote:

> Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>>  struct a(bool x) {...}
>> bool b;
>> a!!b c;
>
> This example is sufficient for me to recommend against the "omit parens"  
> syntax.  Particularly since chained nots are legal, if pointless:
>
> a!!!!!!b c;
>
>> I don't think I'll get used to it :(
>
> I'd get used to it, but I think it reduces at-a-glance clarity, which is  
> a problem since the point of this is to find a syntax more appealing to  
> new users.
>
>
> Sean

I guess that ommiting parens is allowed but discouraged in this situation.  
You can always put them back if you think that missing them hurts clarity.