backporting features to D1

[Derek Parnell]

On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 09:22:12 +0900, Bill Baxter wrote:

>> I'm no longer using D at all. I've lost interest in D1 as D2 looks to be
>> much, much better.

 
> So you're saying you'd be interested in a D1 with non-breaking
> backports?  Or are you looking for something even closer to D2, just
> without the whirlwind?

No, not really. I'm quite happy with the idea that D1 is 'stable' and that
D2 is really an enhanced D1, and is still in prototype mode.

-- 
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia
skype: derek.j.parnell