Is it time for D 3.0?

[Nick Sabalausky]

"Paul D. Anderson" <paul.d.removethis.anderson at comcast.andthis.net> wrote in 
message news:gd07uh$2ckt$1 at digitalmars.com...
>I posted this comment already in the phobos/tango thread but I thought it 
>might be of more general interest.
>
> With all the changes being discussed -- many of the breaking changes -- is 
> it time to move on to D version 3.0?
>
> It seems to me a natural division exists between 2.0, when we had to 
> choose between tango and phobos; and 3.0, when we got to use them both.
>
> Some of the other recent discussions here, template syntax, for example, 
> could fall on the other side of the 2.0/3.0 divide.
>
> I'm sure Walter and others have discussed when and how the move to 3.0 
> will occur. Just wondering if this important change should be a factor.
>

Maybe, but I'd hate to see the D1/D2 divide end up becoming a D1/D2/D3 
divide.