equivariant functions ('in' = headconst!?)

ore-sama spam at here.lot
Sat Oct 18 13:27:59 PDT 2008


Bruno Medeiros Wrote:

> Which means 'in' works exactly as headconst! Is this another easter egg, 
> or a bug? It's certainly not according to the spec at least.

bug in docs. in can't be scope.

docs:
For dynamic array and object parameters, which are passed by reference, in/out/ref apply only to the reference and not the contents.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list