Invariant -- question #2

Bill Baxter wbaxter at gmail.com
Wed Oct 22 07:02:41 PDT 2008


On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 9:44 PM, Bruno Medeiros
<brunodomedeiros+spam at com.gmail> wrote:
> Ary Borenszweig wrote:
>>
>> Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Lars Ivar Igesund
>>> <larsivar at igesund.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It was changed when invariant was introduced to D2 as to make a
>>>> transition
>>>> path ... I think it was announced too.
>>>
>>> I can't find anything about it in the changelog, but maybe it was
>>> buried in the newsgroups somewhere.  W has a habit of not announcing
>>> important changes until three months later when he mentions it in
>>> passing in a reply as if everyone knew about it.
>>
>> Does anyone know about
>>
>> =this() {
>> }
>>
>> ?
>
> I read diffs of the DDoc with each new D2 release, and it wasn't mentioned
> there, so it was probably unreleased, yeah. I wouldn't be surprised if there
> was more stuff like that. :P

That reminds me ... the foo.(bar) template instantation syntax was
supposedly already implemented.  I wonder if that's snuck into this
release too?

--bb



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list