defered new feature

[BCS]

Reply to Andrei,

> BCS wrote:
> 
>> A number of times I have found my self wanting to have "new C(args)"
>> return a class derived from C. I know this can be done with a static
>> function or the like but syntactically, it's unappealing.
>> 
> I'd say the stupid "new" is unappealing.
> 
> Andrei
> 

So you don't like "new" all together?

Ok, then morph the idea to allow "the constructor call syntax" to do the 
above.