Unicode operators

[Bill Baxter]

On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Bent Rasmussen
<IncredibleShrinkingSphere at gmail.com> wrote:
> Agreed.
>
> As an example: what domain does not include boolean expressions? And how
> many domains include vector and matrix operations? Quite many.

> It would be a massive boost for readability in those domains (and in all
> domains, with boolean expressions).

I don't know about you, but to me 'and' and 'or' make for much more
readable boolean expressions than the standard mathematical symbols ^
and v.  Heck, && and || are more readable to me than the math symbols.

> The problem is not the operators themselves; a language does not loose
> anything by extension, it is how exactly to best arrive at the goal of
> having the code look nice and readable with those operators.
>
> - Bent
>
> Hm, anyone fancy the |> operator?

What would that mean?

--bb