A suggestion to D commulity 2

[J Duncan]

Rayne wrote:
> Yonggang Luo Wrote:
> 
>> It's seems that most hard things to geting Phobos and Tango working together is that the "object.d" is different. Because everything is derived from "object.d", so if we want to geting Phobos and Tango working together, we must do a hudge refactoring. But we have to do, because of Phobos and Tango will be larger and larger. And there is such a day, we must geting Phobos and Tango working together, it's be a very hard thing to do. 
>>
>> And we have another choice, that give up Phobos or Tango, leave one library as the stardard! But i think this would be harder.
> 
> Your starting to get annoying with this "have to do" this "have to do" that bullshit, no one has to do anything there is no real big reason to make them compatible with each other, if it's not important and it's not no one is going to care.
> 
> And there is a standard libary already, phobos, why discontinue tangos because it's the standard? Simply because you don't want to be tempted into using tango? Your really not making any sense.

True, but a fundamental issue we are dealing with now is code written 
for one library cannot be used in an application with uses the other 
library. This is getting better as people are making their code work in 
both libraries. Personally, I dont care, but it can be a real pain in 
the ass, especially to people who are new to D.