Ternary Search Trees

[Robert Fraser]

bearophile wrote:
> Robert Fraser:
>> Hey, could you please post your implementation (assuming it's 
>> open-source?) I'd love to use them, but can't be bothered to implement 
>> it. Thanks!
> 
> It's just a translation to D of this Py code:
> Info:
> http://jeethurao.com/blog/?p=146
> Code:
> http://bitbucket.org/woadwarrior/trie/
> 
> Where necessary you can also follow the ideas from the original article here (but using an enum is MUCH better and it's also safer in C, to avoid aliasing):
> http://www.ddj.com/windows/184410528
> 
> My implementation is about 57 times faster than the Python version and much faster than the Psyco version too.
> 
> You can also take a look here:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/ternary/
> 
> You can implement it with a _single_ template struct, filled with all the methods you want:
> 
> struct TST(T) {
>     TST* left, right; 
>     union {
>       TST* mid;
>       int index;
>     }
>     T item;
> 
>     // methods here
> }
> 
> Note that inside there you don't need TST!(T)*, TST* is probably enough, but I don't know why yet.
> 
> You can start with only the few basic methods, test them, and later when/if you want you can add more methods, taking ideas from here:
> http://abc.se/~re/code/tst/tst_docs/index.html
> 
> I'd like to not show my code because it's not nice, it has no comments, tests, etc. But it's quite close to that Py code.
> 
> A problem with that template struct is that even if you add a opIn_r() method as I have done, then you have to do (note the star):
> if (!(k in *ds))
> 
> I don't know if in D2 for structs you can use the syntax you use with classes:
> if (!(k in ds))
> 
> Even better syntax is:
> if (k !in ds)
> 
> In Python you write something better still:
> if k not in ds:
> 
> Bye,
> bearophile

Awesome; thanks