Fully dynamic d by opDotExp overloading
Andrei Alexandrescu
SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org
Fri Apr 17 13:43:20 PDT 2009
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:55:43 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
> <SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org> wrote:
>
>> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>>> "Yigal Chripun" <yigal100 at gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:gsam1p$1ut7$1 at digitalmars.com...
>>>> On 17/04/2009 21:58, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>>>>
>>>> btw, I'm not trying to convince you that dynamic typing is necessary
>>>> always a better solution. What I'm saying is that I agree with
>>>> Andrei - we need to be open minded and have as many useful tools as
>>>> possible in our programmer toolbox. The important thing is to choose
>>>> the right tool for the job.
>>>>
>>> Typically, yes, having "as many useful tools as possible in our
>>> programmer toolbox" is great. But with opDotExp, that's not the whole
>>> story. What opDotExp is, is a tool of only occasional use that
>>> provides only a small benefit, *and* ends up destroying a much more
>>> important tool: compile-time checking on a class's members.
>>
>> s/on a class's members/on the members of the class that actively chose
>> that/
>
> Sure, how do you know that the class actively chose it, or did not
> actively choose it, or will *never* actively choose it simply by looking
> at the statement?
You shouldn't worry about it as much as you shouldn't when you iterate a
built-in array vs. a user-defined range.
> The problem with me is that it doesn't *look* different.
I understand how it could be a problem. The thing is, it is also an
advantage.
> If there was
> some way to denote "call dynamic method" instead of "call static method"
> or some way to denote "has dynamic methods", then I'd have no problem
> with it. Even if you were forced to derive from a special base type in
> order to use dynamic methods, I wouldn't mind that.
Would you like ranges that work very different from built-in arrays, and
everybody to special-case around that?
By the way, D's AAs suck partly because they aren't like anything. I
*really* hate the way D does AAs.
Andrei
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list