Splitter quiz / survey

[Simen Kjaeraas]

Georg Wrede wrote:

> An after-the-fact thought: if the function is called "splitter", then  
> one unavoidably starts thinking about separators. And not terminators.
>
> Had the function been called "separate" or something else, then the  
> notion of "something in between" hadn't been that strong.

So you're saying "separate" does not evoke the thought of separators?

--
 Simen