property / getProperty() / setProperty()

[Jarrett Billingsley]

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Andrei
Alexandrescu<SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org> wrote:
> bearophile wrote:
>>
>> Andrei Alexandrescu:
>>>
>>> Thanks. So it looks like get_property() and set_property() could fly. How
>>> does that sound?
>>
>> Not too much good. Among the simpler solutions there's the 'property'
>> attribute, that while not helping in reducing code (it makes code longer!)
>> solves most problems, while being simple. It's the minimal solution that I
>> think will work/fly.
>
> We can't throw keywords at problems like they're getting out of style. I've
> noticed that here every little problem gets solved by a little keyword. If
> not, some arcane new syntax. Nobody seems to care about rewriting, which I
> think is best.

I don't know if you're just being passive-aggressive here or what.  Is
this a response to my post?

I'll ask again: do you have any *technical* issues with the 'property'
attribute suggestion?