property / getProperty() / setProperty()

[Jarrett Billingsley]

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Andrei
Alexandrescu<SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org> wrote:

>> Of course they're overridable.  They are *functions*.
>
> Then why are you calling them properties? :o)

Stop deliberately misunderstanding me.

>> So let me get this straight: the property attribute would be better
>> technically, but let's not throw more keywords at it; so instead we suggest
>> attributes, but no, they don't have any useful purpose.
>>
>> WHAT.
>
> I didn't say that.

Whatever.  Have fun designing your own language, Andrei.  Must be nice.