Pete wrote:
> I think this is much more elegant:
>
> # int foo(int a) {
> # in {
> # assert(a>2);
> # }
> #
> # return a-1;
> # }
I have to disagree. That suggests that 'in' is a scope within the body,
which would have access to its local variables. Of course, it shouldn't.
--
Michiel Helvensteijn