switch case for constants-only?

[Nick Sabalausky]

"BCS" <none at anon.com> wrote in message 
news:a6268ffdcb78cc43db75126b3c at news.digitalmars.com...
>
> Just jumping a ways down this rabbit hole...
>
> struct S { int i; int opCmp(S s) { return i-- == s.i++; }
>
> {
>    S a,b,c,d,e; ...
>    switch(a)
>    {
>        case b: break;
>        case c: break;
>        case d: break;
>        case e: break;
>    }
> }
>
> Oh, boy. What the hack does the above do?
>

It blatantly abuses operator overloading ;)  Start doing stuff like that, 
and you'll wind up in wonderland even without changing switch.