yank '>>>'?

[dsimcha]

== Quote from KennyTM~ (kennytm at gmail.com)'s article
> On Dec 7, 09 01:24, bearophile wrote:
> > Andrei Alexandrescu:
> >> Should we yank operator>>>?
> >
> > We can change it purpose and add the other one:
> > <<<  rotate left
> >>>> rotate right
> >
> > Bye,
> > bearophile
> No, it will _silently_ break code that uses >>> as unsigned right shift.

Well, we could get around this by making >>> an error for a few releases, and then
only after everyone's removed their >>>s that mean unsigned shift, we could drop
in the rotate semantics.