Static member functions
Tomek Sowiński
just at ask.me
Tue Dec 8 11:17:11 PST 2009
Dnia 08-12-2009 o 20:09:10 Tomek Sowiński <just at ask.me> napisał(a):
> I think immutable static member functions don't make sense and rightly
> so. On functions immutable is about "this" and there's no "this".
> Currently everything inside an immutable struct/class is tagged with
> "immutable". I say, tag everything but static functions. Let immutable
> types define them like anyone else.
>
>
> Tomek
For clarity, I'm not commenting any of Michal's examples, I'm talking
about this:
immutable struct Strukt
{
static void funkcja() { } // now doesn't compile
}
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list