Proof of Concept: Binding to and extending C++ objects via a metricfuckton of templates

[retard]

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:01:34 +0100, downs wrote:

> including such gems as incorrect
> tuple lengths, incorrect tuple slices, endless errors without line
> numbers, spurious template instantiation errors with nonsensical
> parameters, and at least one case where T[0] evaluated to T,
> necessitating the workaround Tuple!(T[0])[0], it felt appropriate.

Why are these needed? Because of compiler bugs?