Proof of Concept: Binding to and extending C++ objects via ametricfuckton of templates

[BCS]

Hello downs,

> retard wrote:
> 
>> Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:01:34 +0100, downs wrote:
>> 
>>> including such gems as incorrect
>>> tuple lengths, incorrect tuple slices, endless errors without line
>>> numbers, spurious template instantiation errors with nonsensical
>>> parameters, and at least one case where T[0] evaluated to T,
>>> necessitating the workaround Tuple!(T[0])[0], it felt appropriate.
>> Why are these needed? Because of compiler bugs?
>> 
> Apparently, in certain very specific corner cases, my version of GDC
> believes that when I say "T[0]", I really mean "T". In that case,
> "Tuple!(T[0])[0]" is like saying "really very the first element". :)
> 

I call it a Bug. Do you have a test case?