Proof of Concept: Binding to and extending C++ objects via a metric fuckton of templates

[Denis Koroskin]

On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 15:25:53 +0300, downs <default_357-line at yahoo.de>  
wrote:

> Tim Matthews wrote:
>> downs wrote:
>>> I've just committed a module to tools that should enable linking and
>>> using any C++ library with D programs without creating a C wrapper for
>>> it.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Does 'any' c++ library even include the ones in c++ namespaces? If so
>> good job thanks.
>
> I don't know about namespaces, but that's a problem with mangling and  
> thus, fixable. I'm currently wrestling with bullet physics, which  
> doesn't use namespaces, so this isn't priority right now :p

What's the wrapper performance penalty (if any)?

And can the code be a bit sanitized? As it is, I believe it is impossible  
to maintain by anyone except the original author, which is a bad thing.