Proof of Concept: Binding to and extending C++ objects via ametric fuckton of templates

[BCS]

Hello Denis,

> On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 15:25:53 +0300, downs <default_357-line at yahoo.de>
> wrote:
> 
>> Tim Matthews wrote:
>> 
>>> downs wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I've just committed a module to tools that should enable linking
>>>> and using any C++ library with D programs without creating a C
>>>> wrapper for it.
>>>> 
>>> Does 'any' c++ library even include the ones in c++ namespaces? If
>>> so good job thanks.
>>> 
>> I don't know about namespaces, but that's a problem with mangling and
>> thus, fixable. I'm currently wrestling with bullet physics, which
>> doesn't use namespaces, so this isn't priority right now :p
>> 
> And can the code be a bit sanitized? As it is, I believe it is
> impossible  to maintain by anyone except the original author, which is
> a bad thing.
> 

Given he works with bullet physics, I'd say being the only one who understands 
it qualifies as a "Bad Thing".