transporting qualifier from parameter to the return value

[Leandro Lucarella]

Andrei Alexandrescu, el 15 de diciembre a las 19:02 me escribiste:
> Time has come to make a decision on implementing Steven
> Schveighoffer's proposal:
> 
> http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?LanguageDevel/DIPs/DIP2
> 
> It's been in the back of my mind for a while now, I don't find a
> fault with it, it solves a very unpleasant problem that would
> seriously mar qualifiers, and although it doesn't solve 100% of the
> potential cases, it does solve a good fraction of them. I am
> confident that we can require body duplication for the remaining
> stragglers with a straight face.
> 
> My main concern is allowing shared to participate to the inout
> transportation. I am tempted to allow it, but shared is constrained
> much more severely than the other two.
> 
> To avoid problems with the existing uses of inout (which is an old
> synonym for ref), the language requires that you redundantly use
> inout in the return type as well. We could eliminate that in D3.
> 
> Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Looks like inout won:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/1389

Doesn't look like a very intuitive name though (another enum? :).

-- 
Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca)                     http://llucax.com.ar/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145  104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Es más probable que el tomate sea perita, a que la pera tomatito.
	-- Peperino Pómoro