Lambda syntax, etc

[Christopher Wright]

Kagamin wrote:
> Yeah, C# lambdas are the killer feature. Slick, readable, C-compatible. Anders knows his job. Let's face it: delegate literals suck a little, mixins as delegates suck a lot, the former is too verbose, the latter just sucks.

C# delegates in C# 2.0 are annoying. I try not to use them. The reason:
D:
void foo(void delegate(int) dg);

C#:
delegate void SomeName(int i);
void foo(SomeName dg);

Does C# 3 fix this? I've seen the new syntax for defining delegates, but 
not for using them.