The path to unity

[Bill Baxter]

On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 1:54 AM, grauzone <none at example.net> wrote:
>> Hmmmmm.  Name for a common namespace...... How about.... "common".
>
> Every time you introduce a new standard namespace, a bunch of innocent
> existing D programs might become invalid.
>

I do in fact have a top level package called "common" where I put a
bunch of code that is common to my various projects.   But I would
happily rename it in a heartbeat if it meant greater unification
between Phobos and Tango.  'Tis a small price to pay.

--bb