The path to unity [You ALL ignored my post!]

[Lutger]

Don wrote:
...
> Are people OK with some of their code breaking for the sake of unity?
> For the math stuff, that would mean name changes on minor functions such 
as:
> isnormal() -> isNormal()
> 
> I need a mandate.

Yes I think that's more than worth it. For D2 direction is to move towards 
compatibility and code breaking will happen anyway. Beyond mere runtime 
compatibility any unification that is uncontroversial is a no brainer imho.