Old problem with performance

[grauzone]

naryl wrote:
> Denis Koroskin Wrote:
>> And here are results (best/average of 3 runs):
>>
>> DMD2.023 - 12.492/12.576 ms (-O -inline)
>> DMC8.42n - 13.941/14.131 ms (-O -inline)
>>
>>
> 
> The only explanation I see is gcc does some optimization that dmd backend doesn't.

That's a good explanation. The only positive thing about the dmd backend 
(or dmd in general) is its compile speed.