escaping addresses of ref parameters - not

[Denis Koroskin]

On Mon, 09 Feb 2009 08:10:31 +0300, Jason House <jason.james.house at gmail.com> wrote:

[snip]

> Also, please find another way than pointer vs. non-pointer to  
> communicate if something can escape.  Once upon a time, D was going to  
> have scope parameters.  I always assumed that meant no escape.  I'd  
> really love to see something along those lines come back.

Whereas I agree about pointers, non-escape should be default so scope is not useful. It is rather nonscope which is needed here.